Öğretmen Adaylarının Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşımı Temel Alan Uygulamaları

Canay DEMİRHAN İŞCAN, Serkan KELEŞOĞLU

Özet


Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adayları tarafından gerçek sınıf ortamında gerçekleştirilen etkinliklerin yapılandırmacı yaklaşıma uygunluğunu belirlemektir. Çalışma, bir eğitim fakültesinde Hayat Bilgisi ve Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi derslerini alan 3. sınıf öğrencileri ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının sınıf içi uygulamaları 5E modeline uygunluk açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının bu model aşamaları arasından en çok açıklama aşamasına uygun olan davranışlara yöneldikleri gözlenmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra 5E modelinin en önemli aşamalarından biri olan bilgiyi derinleştirme aşamasına ilişkin davranışlar en az gözlenmiştir.


Anahtar Kelimeler


yapılandırmacılık; 5e modeli, öğretmen adayı; hayat bilgisi öğretimi; sosyal bilgiler öğretimi.

Tam Metin:

PDF

Referanslar


Al Majali, Y.D.S. (2013). The Impact of (5Es) learning cycle on the outcome and the development

of creative thinking among students of seventh grade in Arabic language course in Alqaser/

karak brigade. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(5), 31-40.

Atasoy, B. (2004). Teaching and Learning of Science Education [Fen Eğitiminde Öğretme ve Öğrenme].

Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık.

Aydın, N. & Yılmaz, A. (2010). The impact of constructivist approach to meta cognitive skills of

students. [Yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın öğrencilerin üst düzey bilişsel becerilerine etkisi]. Hacettepe

University Journal of Education, 39, 57-68.

Aykaç, N. & Ulubey, O. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ opinions about the application level of elementary

school program. [Öğretmen adaylarının ilköğretim proramının uygulanma düzeyine ilişkin

görüşleri]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(1), 63-82.

Boddy, N., Watson, K. & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five E’s: A referent model for constructivist

teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 27-42. Retrieved

from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1023606425452#page-1

Brooks,J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). The Case for The Constructivist Classroom. Newyork:

ASCD.

Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist

Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for the Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Bybee, R. W., Buchwald, C.E., Crissman, S., Heil, D. R., Kuerbis, P. J., Matsumoto, C. & Melnerney,

J.D. (1989). Science and Technology Education for The Elementary Years: Frameworks

for Curriculum and Instruction. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, Boulder, Colorado.

Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED314237.pdf

Bybee, R. W. & Landes, N.M. (1990). Science for life & living: An elementary school science

program from biological sciences curriculum study. The American Biology Teacher,

(2), 92-98. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4449042?sid=21

&uid=4&uid=2

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P.V., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A. & Landes,

N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorada:

Springs BSCS. Retrieved from http://bscs.org/sites/default/files/_legacy/BSCS_5E_

Instructional_Model-Full_Report.pdfCarr, Malcolm, Barker, Miles, Bell, Beverly,

Biddulph, Fred, Jones, Alister, Kirkwood, Valda

Demir, S., Önen, F., & Şahin, F. (2012). Investigating science education pre-service teachers’ level

of self-efficacy towards using constructivist approach. [Fen Bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının

yapılandırmacı yaklaşımı uygulamaya yönelik öz yeterlilik inanc düzeylerinin

belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma]. Paper presented at the Congress of 10th National

Science and Mathematics Education, Turkey: Niğde. Retrieved from http://Kongre.

Nigde.Edu.Tr/Xufbmek/Dosyalar/Tam_Metin/Pdf/2323-29_05_2012-16_43_44.Pdf

Dikici, A., Türker, H.H. & Özdemir, G. (2010). The impact of 5e learning cycle to meaningful

learning. Journal of Education Faculty of Cukurova University 39, 100-128.

Doğanay, A. & Tok, S. (2007). Contemporary Approaches for Teaching. In A. Doğanay (Eds.), In

Methods and Principle of Learning. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.

Driver, R. Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge

in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12. Retrieved from http://

calteach.ucsc.edu/aboutus/documents/Driver-Constructionofscikn.pdf

Er Nas, S., Çoruhlu, T. S. & Çepni, S. (2010). An assessment on the effectiveness of the material

developed for the elaborate stage of the 5e model. Journal of Education Faculty of May

University,29 (1), 17-36. Retrieved from http://www.arastirmax.com/system/files/1066/

uvt_116622.pdf

Ev, H. (2006). Active learning and approaches of measurement and assessment.Paper presented

at the Symposium of Seeking New Paradigm in Turkish Education System (November 5-6),

Turkey: Ankara.

Fensham, P.J., Gunstone, R. & White, R. (1994). Science Content and Constructivist Views of Learning

and Teaching. In P.J. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds.), In the content of science:

A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 147-160). London: The Falmer Press.

Gelbal, S. & Kelecioğlu H. (2007). Teachers’ proficiency perceptions of about the measurement

and evaluation techniques and the problems they confront. Hacettepe University Journal of

Education, 33, 135-145.

Gökçe, E., İşcan Demirhan, C. & Erdem, A. (2012). The observation of teacher candidates on appropriate

studies for constructive classroom. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching,1(1),

-127. Retrieved from http://jret.org/FileUpload/ks281142/File/12.gokce.pdf

Gould, J.S. (2007). Dil becerilerinin öğrenimi ve öğretimine oluşturmacı bir perspektif. [A constructive

perspective to learning and teaching of language skills]. In Fosnot, C.T. (Ed.), Durmuş, S. Translated

by Yapılandırmacılıkta Teori, Perspektifler ve Uygulama. Ankara: Nobel Yayın–Dağıtım.

Gray, A. (1997). Constructivist teaching and learning. SSTA Research Centre Report. Retrieved

fromhttp://www.saskschoolboards.ca/old/ResearchAndDevelopment/ResearchReports/

Instruction/97-07.htm

Karplus, R. (1980). Teaching for the development of reasoning. Research in Science Education, 10,

-10. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02356303#page-1

Kaya, N. (2013). The attitude of class teachers to constructivism and self-efficacy belief on constructivist

practices (Afyonkarahisar sample). [Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yapılandırmacılığa ilişkin

tutumu ve yapılandırmacı uygulamalara ilişkin öz yeterlik inancı: Afyonkarahisar örneği]. (Unpublished

master thesis), Afyonkocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar.

Lawson, A.E., Abraham, M.R. & Renner, J.W. (1989). A theory of instruction: Using the learning

cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills. National Association for Research

in Science Teaching, College of Education, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,

OH45221.Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED324204.pdf (ED

.

Leinhardt, G. (1992). What research on learning tells us about teaching. Educational Leadership,

(7), 20. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/

el_199204_leinhardt.pdf

Llewellyn, D. (2005). Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin

Press. Matthews, M.R. (1997). Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism

in science education. Science and Education, 6(1-2), 5-14.

Metin, M. & Özmen, H. (2009). Difficulties of pre-service teachers in developing and implementing

teaching activities based on 5e model in constructivist approach. [Yapılandırmacı yaklaşımda

e modeline dayalı etkinliklerin geliştirilmesi ve uygulanmasında öğretmen adaylarının

karşılastığı zorluklar]. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics

Education 3(2), 94-123.

Newby, D.E. (2004). Using inquiry to connect young learners to science. Retrieved

fromhttp://www.nationalcharterschols.org/uploads/pdf/resource20040617125804using%

Inguiry.pdf

Öz, F. (2006). Practical with Turkish Teaching-Improved According to the New Curriculum. [Yeni

Programa Göre Geliştirilmiş Uygulamalı Türkçe Öğretimi]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Pınar, M. A. (2013). The views of science and technology teachers toward classroom practices of

constructivist approach (Diyarbakir sample). [Yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın sınıf uygulamalarına

ilişkin Fen ve Teknoloji öğretmenlerinin görüşleri: Diyarbakır örneği]. (Unpublished master

thesis), Mus Alparslan University, Mus.

Rainer, J., Guyton, E. & Bowen, C. (2000). Constructivist pedagogy in primary classrooms. Paper

presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, USA:

New Orleans, LA, (April 24-28). Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED440760.pdf

(ED 440 760).

Richardson V. (1997). Constructivist Teacher Education. New York: Falmer Press.

Savaşçı, F. & Berlin, F. D. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to constructivism

in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education,23 (1), 65-86. doi:

1007/s10972-011-9262-z.

Schunk, H.D. (2004). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspectives. (4th edition). New Jersey:

Pearson Prentice Hall.

Settlagh, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the approach

by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Education, 84, 43–50.

Simpson, L. T. (2002). Dare I oppose constructivist theory?. The Educational Forum, 66,

-662. doi: 10.1080/00131720208984854.

Tanner, K. D. (2010). Order matters: Using the 5e model to align teaching with how people

learn. CBE Life Science Education, 9(3),159-164. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-06-0082.

Tsai, C.C. (1998). Science learning and constructivism. Curriculum and Teaching, 13,31-52.

Ün Açıkgöz, K. (2005). Effective Teaching and Learning. [Etkili Öğretme ve Öğrenme].

İzmir: Eğitim Dünyası.

Vermette, P., Foote, C., Bird, C., Mesibov, D., Harris-Ewing, S. & Battaglia, C. (2001).

Understanding constructivism(s): a primer for parents and school board members.

Education, 122(1), 87.

Wilder, M. & Shuttleworth, P. (2005). 5E learning cycle lesson. Science Activities, 41 (1),

-31. doi: 10.3200/SATS.41.4.37-43.

Wilson, B.G. (1996). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional

Design. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.


Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.


http://www.Kefdergi.com

 

ULUSLARARASI BİLİMSEL HAKEMLİ DERGİDİR.

 

ISI (THOMSON REUTERS MASTER JOURNAL LIST)


 

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Veri Tabanı

 

ASOS INDEX (AKADEMIA SOSYAL BİLİMLER İNDESKSİ)

tarafından taranmaktadır.