Öğretmen Adaylarının Biçimlendirici Değerlendirme Uygulamalarının İncelenmesi: Eylem Araştırması Modeli

Pınar KARAMAN, Ayhan KARAMAN

Özet


Eylem araştırması metodolojisine göre gerçekleştirilen bu araştırma, öğretmen adaylarının biçimlendirici değerlendirme uygulamaları ile bu alana yönelik düşüncelerini ve becerilerini geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, bir eğitim fakültesinin okul öncesi öğretmenliği dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinden Araştırma Projesi dersine katılan 12 öğretmen adayı ile gerçekleşmiştir. Bu ders kapsamında adaylar öğretmenlik uygulamaları için aynı ilde bulunan ana okula devam etmişlerdir. Çalışmada veriler, öğretmen adaylarının saha notları ve açık uçlu sorulara verdikleri cevaplar aracılığı ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin çözümlemesinde içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, öğretmen adaylarının genel olarak sınıflarda gün-gün yaptıkları biçimlendirici değerlendirme uygulamalarının pedagojik gelişmelerine temel düzeyde yardımcı olduğu söylenebilir. Diğer taraftan öğretmen adaylarının uygulama sürecinde yaşadıkları zorluklar arasında zamanı etkili kullanamama ve okul öncesi yaş grubuna uygun ölçme ve değerlendirme yapamama olduğu tespit edilmiştir.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Biçimlendirici değerlendirme; okul öncesi öğretmen adayları; eylem araştırması

Tam Metin:

PDF

Referanslar


Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment. A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practices, 18(1), 5–25.

Bennett, K.R., & Cunningham, A.C. (2009). Teaching Formative Assessment Strategies to Preservice Teachers, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25:3, 99-105.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Maidenhead, Open University Press.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 7–73.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Changing teaching through formative assessment: research and practice. The King’s-Medway-Oxfordshire formative assessment project. In Formative assessment improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 223–40). Paris: OECD.

Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.

Bowman, B., Donovan, S. & Burns, S. (Eds.) (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our pre-schoolers. Report of Committee on Early Childhood Pedagogy, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (Eds.). (1992). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Brown, L. (1988). Group self-evaluation: learning for improvement. School Improvement Plan. Secretariat, Education Department of Victoria Canada.

Buck, G. A., Trauth-Nare, A., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessment discernable to pre-service teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 402–21.

Buldu, M. (2010). Making learning visible in kindergarten classrooms: Pedagogical documentation as a formative assessment technique. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1439-1449.

Carmona, G., Stroup, W., & Davis, S. (2006). Introducing preservice teachers to formative assessment: Improving assessment design and accountability in school mathematics through a network-based learning environment. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Universidad Pedagogica Nacional, Meridia, Mexico.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.

Confrey, J., & Makar, K. (2005). Critiquing and improving data use from high stakes tests: Understanding variation and distribution in relation to equity using dynamic statistics software. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & l. C.

Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 198-226). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.

Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–51.

de Zeeuw, G. (2003). Helping others: Projects or research? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. 13, 496–503.

Epstein, A.S., Schweinhart, L.J., De-Bruin-Parecki, A., & Robin, K.B. (2004). Preschool Assessment: A Guide To Developing A Balanced Approach. Preschool Matters, 7 1-12, Natioanal Institute for Early Education Research.

Gotwals, A. W., & Birmingham, D. (2016). Eliciting, Identifying, Interpreting, and Responding to Students’ Ideas: Teacher Candidates’ Growth in Formative Assessment Practices. Res Sci Educ, 46,365–388.

Guddemi, M., & Case, B. J. (2004). Assessing young children. Assessment report, PearsonEducation. (2016, Eylül19)

Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues Practice, 28, 24–31.

Johnson, A. P. (2002). A short guide to action research. Boston, London, Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

Kohler, F., Henning, J. E., & Usma-Wilches, J. (2008). Preparing preservice teachers to make instructional decisions: An examination of data from the teacher work sample. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2108–2117.

Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–39.

Maclellan, E. (2004). Initial knowledge states about assessment: Novice teachers’ conceptualizations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 523–535.

Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., & Light, D. (2006, April). A theoretical framework for data-driven decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. http://cct.edc.org/sites/cct.edc.org/files/publications/DataFrame_AERA06.pdf (2016, Eylül 20).

MEB. (2006). Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı, İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.

MEB (2013). Okulöncesi Eğitim Programı. http://tegm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2013_04/04124340_programkitabi.pdf (2016, Eylül 16)

Miller, D., & Lavin, F. (2007). “But now I want to give it a try”: Formative assessment, self-esteem and a sense of competence. The Curriculum

Journal. 18(1), 3-25.

Mills, G. (2006) Action research. A guide for the teacher researcher. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall

National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1987). Standardized testing of young children 3 through 8 years of age. (Position statement). Washington, DC: NAEYC. http://www.naeyc.org/resources/position_statements/pstestin.htm (2016, Ağustos 12)

National Council of teachers of English (NCTE) (2013). Formative assessment that truly informs instruction. A statement on an educational issue approved by the NCTE Board of Directors of the NCTE Executive Committie. Urbana, IL. http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/formative-assessment (2016, Ağustos 20)

Nilsson, P. (2013). What do we know and where do we go? Formative assessment in developing student teachers’ professional learning of teaching science, Teachers and Teaching, 19:2, 188-201

Nuthall, G. (2007). The Hidden Lives of Learners. Wellington, NZ: NZCER Press.

Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 497–523.

Özlen-Demircan, H., Olgan, R. (2011). Assessment in early childhood education: Commonly used curriculum models and Turkish curriculum, TOJNED : The Online Journal Of New Horizons In Education, 1(3), 16-22.

Price, J. N. (2001). Action research, pedagogy and change: The transformative potential of action research in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 43-7 4.

Sapsağlam, Ö. (2013). Değerlendirme boyutuyla okul öncesi eğitim programları (1952-2013). Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 63-73.

Stiggins, R. (2009). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In H. L. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 233–50). New York: Routledge.

Tillema, H.H. (2009). Student teachers assessment for learning to teach: Appraisal of practice teaching lessons by mentors supervisors, and student teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 155–167.

Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing Formative Assessment in the Classroom: using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27 (5), 615-631.

Tripp, D. (1990). Socially critical action research. Theory in Practice, 29(3), 158-166.

Volante, L., & Beckett, D. (2011). Formative assessment and the contemporary classroom: Synergies and tensions between research and practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 34, 239–255.

Wininger, S., & Norman, A. (2005). Teacher candidates’ exposure to formative assessment in educational psychology textbooks: A content analysis. Educational Assessment, 10, 19-37.

Yılmaz-Topuz, G., Erbil-Kaya, Ö.M. (2016). Okulöncesi eğitim öğretmenlerinin çocukları tanıma ve değerlendirme amaçlı yapılan çalışmalara ilişkin görüşleri. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 6(1), 27-62.


Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.


http://www.Kefdergi.com

 

ULUSLARARASI BİLİMSEL HAKEMLİ DERGİDİR.

 

ISI (THOMSON REUTERS MASTER JOURNAL LIST)


 

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Veri Tabanı

 

ASOS INDEX (AKADEMIA SOSYAL BİLİMLER İNDESKSİ)

tarafından taranmaktadır.